The Young Heroes Museum

The city of Voroshilovgrad, in the Soviet State of Ukraine, differed from the images presented in my State Department pre-departure debriefing. The buildings were not massive and block like, there was no hustle and no bustle, and more greenery existed than the gray drab photos I had seen. Furthermore, churches and onion domes decorated more of the skyline than I expected the Soviets to allow. There were many pleasant things about this city, but the details of those city buildings and historical monuments are not what I remember most. I remember a single day, or more exactly, a single place. A place I think about now and again.

I entered the Young Heroes Museum looking for a distraction from the speeches and conditioned interviews with various city officials. I knew nothing about the museum and knew not what to expect. The bright red carpet, typical of many patriotic buildings, covered the floor. A few dioramas interrupted the empty feel of the sparse interior. Portraits hung on the walls. Just beyond the entrance a giant statue greeted visitors. Below it, a plaque outlined the contributions of young people from this city during the German invasion.

My eyes rolled – another war memorial. I usually avoid war memorials. I understand the sense of loss felt by the families, but I cannot ignore that many become soldiers by choice. All soldiers receive training on how to kill and avoid being killed. Their trainers often provide them with weapons to carry out their duties. The format of most memorials vary little: lists of battles, statistics about lives lost, medals won, plaques and busts of those who died, and quite frequently treatises on the justness of the war to ensure that no one died in vain. As a pacifist, I derived little value from such commemorations. However, I was in the door and my Kopecks paid.

There did not seem to be much, and I believed would be quick, so I continued onward.
As I moved closer to the pictures, instead of seeing portraits of soldiers who died in battle, I saw faces of young boys and girls. With the docent’s help, I read that they ignored the evacuations and used acts of sabotage to thwart the German advance and occupation. Far from being conditioned and hardened Soviet soldiers with orders or training, they were children doing what they could to defend their homeland.

Unlike other museums, seeing the faces of those who died allowed me to establish a connection. Theses faces seemed similar to the faces of my old classmates – the bully, the popular kids, the outcaste, the clown.

I spent most of the day examining the faces. Some appeared in old photographs, while others were in paintings or sketches. Each face beamed with innocent earnestness. Some looked mature and ready for adulthood, others looked young and mischievous. Eyes full of dreams, and dreams lost, looked back at me. Captions below the faces spelled out their names, dates of life, accomplishments, family history, and quite frequently method of death.

Here the horrors of war and the depths of man’s inhumanity toward man revealed themselves. Girls prostituted themselves for information. Boys and girls stole foodstuffs, made makeshift fire bombs, and used stolen guns to kill the invaders. When caught, the lucky ones were executed quickly while the others, like Klava Kovaleva were tortured to death.

“Klava Kovaleva, 17 years old is taken swollen, the right breast is cut off, left leg burnt and left foot cut off,….to be buried in a communal grave of heroes on the central area of Krasnodon.”
Not all stories ended in hideous torture. Some died in battle, like Vasily Borisov who died the day after his seventeenth birthday trying to disrupt German communication lines. These children attempted to shoulder the defense of their homeland. Hundreds were killed, nearly a hundred were identified and immortalized in this museum. Although posthumously awarded various medals, as if to point out that their sacrifice was not in vain, I spun from the realization that too many of these children were too young: Seventeen, Sixteen, Fifteen, Twelve.

At the end of the day, I walked out of the museum with my feelings of disgust for war reaffirmed yet subsumed in conflict. The actions of the invaders were cruel and horrific. In the final analysis the sacrifices made by the youth were futile – not affecting the outcome of the war. So were the children courageous or foolish? Did they have resolve or did they lack self worth? World events thrust these children of Voroshilovgrad into making decisions without the orchestration or manipulation of some lofty principle. They acted on elemental feelings of self preservation and defense. They organized themselves and fought back. Do these reasons alone merit glory and commemoration? What of those who feel so marginalized that their only course of action, their only way of defending their way of life, is to explode themselves? The faces and questions plagued me then as they do today.

The most passionate amongst us are youth. Without knowing all that life offers, they frequently set their own well being aside for the sake of a cause. Forces of good and evil tap into this reservoir of eagerness to fulfill the most expendable positions in their schemes. From suicide bombers to front line war conscripts, the best hopes for any nation’s future often ends in brief acts of violence which in turn breed more hatred and resentment.

In the years since, the city changed its name to Lugansk, the Soviet Union dissolved, and a stable peace developed among the USA and Russia and the previous Soviet states. However, the world still knows war and the devastation it brings. As I hear reports of young people who fight and die fulfilling someone else’s vision of the world, I think not just about the justness of the struggle, but also about the cost. Some are on the right side of battle and some are not. Sometimes, there is no right side. Regardless, I have faces to put to the young that die in battle. They are the faces of boys and girls hanging on the walls of the Young Heroes Museum.

Some of the stories from Wiki:

Ulyana Gromova


Ulyana Matveevna Gromova was a Ukrainian Soviet member of the Soviet underground resistance in World War II, executed by the Nazis. She is a posthumous Hero of the Soviet Union. Gromova was born to working-class family on 3 January 1925 in the village of Pervomaysky in what is now Luhansk Province of the Ukraine. Gromova’s father, Matthew Maximovich Gromov, was born in 1880 in Poltava Province of Ukraine part of the Russian Empire. Gromova’s father served in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 moved to Krasnodon and worked as mineworker, retiring in 1937. Gromova’s mother was housewife. In March 1940 Ulyana Gromova joined the Komsomol. At the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, Gromova was 17 years old and in tenth grade. Like many of her classmates, she worked in agriculture to replace farm workers and took care of wounded soldiers in the hospital, she was graduated from high school with good to excellent marks on 3 June 1942. When her home province was occupied by German troops, which began on 17 July 1942, Gromova was not able to evacuate because she needed to care for her sick mother.

Together with Maya Peglivanovoy and Anatoly Popov, she organized a group of patriotic young people in her village of Pervomaysky who became part of the “Young Guard” of the underground resistance Komsolol organization in September 1942. In October 1942, Gromova was elected a member of staff of the organization, she took an active part in the preparations for armed resistance, the creation and dissemination of anti-fascist leaflets, collecting medicines, campaigning among the population, urging them to not obey the enemy and to disrupt plans to supply the Germans with material and impress Soviet youth to work in Germany. On the night of November 7, 1942, Gromova and Popov hoisted the red flag on a pipe shaft at Mine Number 1 in occupied Krasnodon. Mass arrest of suspected underground figures began in the city, the Young Guards developed an escape plan for Gromova, but she was arrested by the German authorities on 10 January 1943, she was beaten and tortured during interrogation, but she stayed true to her oath to her motherland and comrades and did not reveal details of the underground’s activities.

She was hung by her hair, burned with hot irons, had a five-pointed star cut into her back and the wound rubbed with salt, suffered a broken arm and broken ribs. She endured her suffering stoically, cheered her imprisoned comrades by reciting Lermontov’s epic poem Demon, which she knew by heart. In the note which she managed to pass secretly to her relatives, knowing her death was near, she expressed faith in victory and called for her brother Elisha to stand for his homeland. On 16 January 1943 Gromova, along with other Young Guards, was executed, her body thrown in the 58-meter pit of Mine Number 5 in Krasnodon. After the liberation of Krasnodon, Gromova was buried with military honors on 1 March 1943 in a mass grave of patriotic heroes in the central square of Krasnodon, where a memorial to the Young Guards was erected. Hero of the Soviet Union Order of Lenin Medal “Partisan of the Patriotic War” 1st Class Gromova is a character in Alexander Fadeyev’s 1946 novel The Young Guard, included in school curriculums.

 

Oleg Koshevoy

Oleg Vasilyevich Koshevoy was a Soviet partisan and one of the founders of the clandestine organization Young Guard, which fought the Nazi forces in Krasnodon during World War II between 1941 and 1945. Born in Pryluky, a city in the Chernihiv Oblast of present-day north-central Ukraine, Oleg Koshevoy’s family moved south to Rzhyshchiv and Poltava before settling in Krasnodon in 1940, where he attended secondary school. In July 1942, Krasnodon was occupied by the German Army. Under the leadership of the party underground, Koshevoy organized an anti-nazi Komsomol organization called the Young Guard, becoming its commissar. In January 1943, the Germans exposed the organization. Oleg Koshevoy was soon apprehended, he was tortured and executed on February 9, 1943. On September 13, 1943, Oleg Koshevoy was posthumously awarded the title of the Hero of the Soviet Union, the Order of Lenin, the Medal “Partisan of the Patriotic War” 1st class. Many mines, sovkhozes and Young Pioneer groups in the Soviet Union were named after him.

citation: https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Young_Guard_(Soviet_resistance)

Sexism alive and well at my work

We all have self images of ourselves.  We are bigger, stronger, more courageous than the lesser of those around us.  However, what happens when you get a reality check.

In a meeting, a presenter was giving a lesson on stereotypes in masculinity and femininity.  I had seen this lesson before.  Stereotypical images of men and women in advertising would be shown, and they we would have to comment on it.  The images would most likely show the worst stereotypes….

4 images into the presentation, the images became sexualized and depicted photo-shopped images of scantily clad clothes selling makeup or purses or something of the like.  Then, from behind me one of my colleagues said loudly: “Finally, some decent images to look at during PD”

Stunned, I said nothing.  I thought of saying: “Inappropriate and unwelcome.”  But I didn’t.  Why not?  Here was part of my calculus.

My relationship with that particular colleague has always been strained.  If I don’t have positive stuff to say to him, I don’t say anything.  He is also in a precarious situation in his life (by his own admission.  He is undergoing a variety of hardships).  The presenter was trying to race through a 2 hour presentation in 30 minutes, and dropping an accusation would have derailed the presentation.  Also, this particular person, tends to get angry and yell, and it was  long week and I didn’t need that at week’s end.    By the time I ran through all these thoughts, the 5 seconds for that picture had passed and we were on to other images, and I felt like the moment had passed.

I told the boss at the end that he should talk to my coworker to complete my cowardly act.

In the end, that’s what it was.  I was cowardly.  I did not have the strength of will to stand up and do the right thing.  If that comment was about certain ethnicity would  I have stood up?  If it was a cultural differences, would I have stood up?  Would I have stood up if I was in a position of power?  I like to think that I would have stood up if a student had said it.

I thought about this all afternoon.  I lost sleep about this.  The next morning I sent a note of apology to the instructor.

I’m Alive

I’m back.  I’m in one piece. I’m a little scruffy and a little lighter. It was an amazing trip, and much harder than I had planned for (partly because I’m wimpier than my self-image, and partly because the conditions were more challenging than my rosy-colored projections allowed me to see).

 

My first night in a tent was on 6/29 at 9,800 feet at Horseshoe Meadows (South of Mount Whitney), to acclimate to the higher altitudes.  I was feeling fine the next day so I hiked to my first pass: New Army (12,000 feet+).  I camped below the accent to attempt at first light.  It took me some time to get near enough to the summit to realize that I would not be able surmount the 40 foot cornice….even with my ice axe and crampons. I had no mountaineering experience and was too chicken to try.  So I had to detour around to Cottonwood Pass which added an additional 20 miles on to my trip.

 

Frustrated, I tried Whitney a few days later.  After climbing for about eight hours with my 50 pound bag, I ran out of water and time about a mile and 1,500 feet lower than the 14,500 foot summit. I decided to turn around and fail for a second time. I was frustrated and was beginning to think I wouldn’t be able to complete the trip.  I was passed everyday by about five Pacific Crest Trail hikers who were lean mean hiking machines.  Some of them encouraged me and gave me lots of positive
energy.  If they could do it, so could I.

 

I dug in.  In the next few weeks I managed to walk 283 miles, climb over 11 passes above 11,000 feet (6 over 12,000) most of which were covered with snow.  I managed to do snow accents and descents, glissades, ice traverses, and managed to cross sun cup fields.   I was truly terrified getting over some of these passes with Glenn, Mather, Muir, and Pinochet taking me more than six hours to get over.  On some of these, I was alone and no one to rely on but myself to get over and get home to
family.

 

River crossings were also challenging.  While the vast majority had log or ice bridges, or boulders to jump to and from, some tested my metal.  Some crossings were chest high with slow moving ice water, other were raging fast and thigh deep.  The South Fork Kings River was fast moving and gut deep, but there appeared no way around it. I found a spot were the river forked and tried to cross.   Leaning full weight into the flow it still pushed me backwards.  I managed to ford it.  It dragged me a little – a brush with a fate I’d rather not imagine.   Snow made the path hard to find.  Boot tracks were everywhere, and then disappeared.  I found
myself lost in the wild for at least an hour before and after the major passes.  Massive amounts of Avalanche damage required navigation over downed trees, boulders, and swampy conditions from rerouted streams all while fending off mosquito hoards with nothing better to do than feed on my blood.

 

Harrowing experiences aside, the beauty of our planet amazed me daily. Whether it was watching a humming bird give itself a bird bath in the trail in front of me (causing me to wait until it was done), or watching a buck walk by me as a rested under a tree, or the majesty and presence of the Sierra’s dominant geological features, or even the hydrological power put out by all the snow melt, our planet produces some amazing places.  It has encouraged me to keep working in whatever ways I can to preserve them.

 

It was an emotional trip for me.  I slipped from frustration one moment to wild euphoria the next, to intense pining for my family throughout the day.   I finished with a 20 mile hike down from Long Meadow, up then down Half Dome finishing at Happy Isles 7/21 at 7pm.   I wept with a joy that is hard to explain in words for my accomplishment.  I then caught my breath then walked another mile right into the Curry Village shower house for half hour shower.

 

I am grateful to be home with my family whom I missed so intensely.  I am grateful for the many hikers on the trail who rooted me on and gave me oomph when I didn’t think I had any left. I am grateful for the support and love and positive thoughts of all those who crossed their fingers or said a prayer to whatever intangibility they believe in to keep me safe, whole, and courageous enough to finish something that was well  beyond what I should have been able to do.  I am most grateful for
Sharleen, Alyssa, and Kylie who loved me enough to let go, and trusted me enough to make the right calls to come home.

 

I had no great revelations except this:  Being on the trail without a safety net strips away all the unessential.  It forces you to be absolutely mindful of the moment (where will I step, can I cross here, is that a safe route for me, where can I poop) all the superfluous stuff that fills and a clouds our
thoughts slips away and becomes nonsensical.  There is inherent value in this.  There is also value, I believe, in pushing oneself to and beyond what we believe we were capable of, as it allows us to be capable of more.  After all, isn’t that what we all want – to be more than we were?
Peace and Love
to you all,

Gentrification in Costa Rica

We visited Cabo Matapalo on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica.  It was great.  We met a fabulous guide Rodolfo.  He described how his family owned a large tract of land (finca) in which they grew many fruits and vegetables for sale.  However, his family sold the land to pay for school for his seven brothers and sisters.

“Do you look at the land now and regret that.   There seem to be smaller lots and more resort style tourists moving in”

“No, because I have so many more opportunities now. Also, many of the new land owners coming from rich countries allow the land to return to a forest state which provides more habitat for native wildlife.”

It seemed like he was ok with the changes; however later we passed a house and scowled: “Some of the people move down here for Costa Rica, yet they change everything, they pull out native plants and trees and plant things that are harmful.  Look here this vine is killing everything it grows on.  And there, look, there is no path for arboreal mammals to move from tree to tree.  Why move here if you want to change everything about it.”

And later we had this exchange: “People complain why I charge so much.  I ask them to go shopping.  They comeback and tell me everything is so expensive.  Right I say, that is why I have to charge a lot for my services.   I have to live.  The change is like upgrading from 3G to 4G, it costs more, and you can’t stay at 3G if everyone else goes to 4G.”

Towards the end of our time with him he also noted: “There are less and less Ticos here.  I don’t even say ‘Hola’ when walking down the street anymore.  And granola?  No one would have wanted granola 20 years ago, now our stores stock food that is not typical.  This also drives prices up.”

He was describing a process of gentrification.  Many of the for sale signs we saw said that: “For Sale” by USA firms such as Century 21 or Caldwell bankers.  Many did not say : “Se Vende Lotes”.  Many of the hotels, AirBB, and were owned and operated by ex-patriots. All with stories of finding their way to Costa Rica and falling in love with it and staying.

“I finished my last tour with the Grateful Dead, and decided to come here.”  “I’ve always dreamt of the of the Jungle, and when I came here, I found what was in my dream.” “I left home at 16 to surf. I came to here, and never left…that was 30 years ago.” “I was hired for a a director position, and decided to take a vacation before getting behind a desk.  I got here, and decided I didn’t want to leave.”

We went to local’s market on Friday night.  We expected local goods and wares for locals.  Instead of a farmer’s market-like environment, there was jewelry and handicrafts, homemade soaps (proudly bragging they were now in the airport), and ice cream.  All but two vendors were Tico, the rest had relocated there from up north.  Moreover, the market resembled Telegraph Ave in Berkeley rather than a local market where people bought and sold items  they both grew and needed.  We saw mostly gringos, talking English, who were shopping for trinkets rather than weekly needs.

A lot of people we met who relocated there seemed to have been broken and looked towards Costa Rica for healing.  Were they in turn draining Costa Rica?

 

Police Violence

Once again two young black men are dead because of “arrest-related death”

Here are the stats for arrest related deaths 2003-2009: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ard0309st.pdf

Of the many numbers that stood out to me were the fact that “accidental” deaths for young men of color were higher than their white counterparts. More damning is the fact that because

White population ~ 63.7%  Black non-hispanic population 12.2%  Source Wiki

White population deaths (2003-2009) = 2026  Black non-hispanic deaths = 1529

12.2/63.7 = x/2026 ==> x=388

So if things were proportional and equal 388 Black non-hispanic people should have been killed.

But 1529 were.  How much greater is this number?

1529/388 =3.94

3.94 times greater

So Black non-hispanics are 4 times more likely to have an arrest related death when accounting for population

If we do the same for white and non-white

36.3/63.7 = x/2026 ==> x=1155

So if things were proportional and equal 1155 non-white people should have been killed.

But 2787 were.  How much greater is this number?

2787/1155 = 2.4

2.4 times greater.

So if you are non-white you are 2.4 times more likely to have an arrest related death.

What the HELL, When will this change!

 

I wonder:

*What about years 2010-2015?

*Arrest-Deaths assumes equal chance of contact.  However people of color are more likely to have police encounters does this again increase likelihood of Arrest-Death encounters.

 

 

A trip to the coastal redwoods in Humboldt

I must admit that I’m a bit of a tree-huger.   In a recent visit to the coastal redwood forests in Redwood National Park, Humboldt State Park, and…. I witnessed many spectacular natural phenomenon from big trees, to Roosevelt Elk, marbled murrelets, spotted owls, the tailed pacific frog, the Pacific Giant Salamander, and others.

I love trees!
I love trees!

2015_summer1 443

 

Raised on books like the giving tree and the Lorax trees hold a special and magical spot in my heart.   However, I learned some facts that really made me question my view of people who log trees.

Many people, including the people I met, acknowledge that their past practices 1800-1970s were pretty reprehensible.  However they are using dramatically different methods.

Fact 1: Most are concerned with the long term longevity of the forest.  They consider it a crop and do not want it to expire.  In speaking  with a small hobbyist, his forest in 1970 was 1.7 million board feet of lumber.  He’s sold 1.9 million of board feet since then (2015), and current estimates put his stock at 2.5 million of board feet on his property.  Larger commercial enterprises (Green Diamond, HRC,) also have similar calculations.

Fact 2: The above fact points to the fact that Nature Bats Last.  While images of a clear cut, or of the logging practices showing a scared land as late as the 1970s, surprisingly, the forests are back and more dense.  They recover.  While they are not “old growth” they are thriving and practices are in place for sustainability.

Fact 3: Most people harvesting timber practice Silviculture, that is managing their forest to sustain diversity of growth, bio-diversity, and sustainability.  They take time to evaluate each tree in a particular stand that they will harvest.  The evaluate the effect of wildlife, surrounding vegetation, the watershed, and the overall feel of the forest …tree-by-tree and stand-by-stand.  There is advanced modeling larger companies use to preserve the health of the forest and those dependent on it.

What do we want?  This is the overriding question.  In the 1800s they wanted to eradicate forests in favor of farm and  pastureland.   The early Yurok and Hupa Native Americans routinely burned the forest…keeping it at bay, in order to encourage the growth of Bear Grass (essential for basket weaving), and keep meadoes in place to encourage wildlife for hunting.   Currently we have a love-hate relationship with nature.  We want to visit it and revel in its wonder.  Yet we also want to control it.  We want to control fire.  We want to control when and were it can go.  We want to use it for recreation and save it for our posterity.  We try to remove invasive species that choke out local natives (Such as Ivy, scotch broom, and barred owls…), but we won’t remove ourselves as perhaps the most invasive species of all.   We fear too much what will happen if we let nature run its course…because that would undeniable mean things we want to look at today would be destroyed and not pristine until perhaps 100-200 years from now. Our wants as a society are as diverse as mother natures equation.

So we “manage” nature to guarantee it will be what we want, while allowing nature to be what we (with our best intentions and science) understand it to be.  Of the many concerns I have about this, two primary concerns come to the fore.

1: The cost and energy required for such an undertaking are immense.  We do so because we currently are rich.  What is the total energy footprint of this management I wonder.  Is it really cost-effective?  What will happen when we become poor.  This is a “rich white value” and I’m wondering how will we sustain it when things change.

2: Mother Nature’s equation is way to complex for us to understand.  Our history is one of doing something today, without fully understanding what the effect will be to other species or over time.  We keep figuring it out. We’ll just introduce a toad here, or a snake there, or plant there, and before we know it, we’ve destabilized an entire region.  Moreover, mother nature is a killer.  There is a constant battle of species dominance and infinite cycles of life and death.  When we intervene, we take sides…this interrupts cycles and erodes various species ability to adapt. Rather they adapt to our intermediate habits, and when we change, they fail to change in step.  In short we meddle with a system that is beyond our capability of understanding (yet?).  The cost has been and will continue to be the destruction of that which we want to save.

 

 

Lock Down – part 2

Two different people called the police from a classroom phone and stated that there was someone waving a gun around in their classroom at my school.  Upon listening the dispatch, the administrator was pretty sure he recognized the voices, and was also fairly certain that the call was a prank.  The end result of the police action also showed that calls were untrue.  However, due the nature of the threat, the heightened sense of fear around school shooters, and the proximity of our school to a child care center, the police moved prior to affording the principle the ability to listen to the dispatch.

This lockdown was unlike others.   There were teachers who we not happy with administrative stewardship in a time of crisis.  Two students now face criminal and school district consequences for there roll.  A teacher, in from whose room the students called, is also facing an uncertain future.   And, there are students whose opinion of law enforcement was reinforced by this display of force.

Most students intellectually understood the danger of the situation and the need to stay in their room.  However, many students still let their feeling inform their interpretation of the events rather than their intellectual self.    Some students still blame police rather than individuals who made the call.

Many students have brushed off the events as early as the day after with an “Meh….”  How many of these students draw connections with actions and consequents – long term or short term? What will happen to a veteran teacher, who cares about their students?  Do the students who love them, even make a connection?

A question that arose in a discussion with another teacher is about how to “take the lockdown seriously.”   A particular teacher had their students on the floor in the corner for the 90 minute lockdown.   This was how they took it serious.  I tried to keep my students calm by keeping their focus on their work.  They were engaged with learning activities instead of huddled, on the floor in one place.  I was unsuccessful in keeping them from their phones; however many of them were using their phones for the projects they were working on.  While I do not regret having them clustered under our red dot for 90 minutes, I have two big regrets.  Firstly, I did not ensure they were off their phones and attentive to me or the sounds around.   While using their electronics kept nearly all of the same calm and passive, it did keep them from hearing what was happening outside and could have been a problem if the nature of the danger was different.  Second, I did not prepare students for police entry.  I should have informed them about how the police may enter the room.  Not to make sudden movements, and stay in one spot.   A quick hands up and “Don’t shoot” may look different to an officer primed for engagement.   I feel like I did when my daughter was nearly hit by a car, but wasn’t – bizarre mix of thankfulness and anger.   It could have ended very differently, I’m thankful it did not.

As part of the restorative process, I think it is important for the officers and students to meet again in different circumstances.  Both parties ned to see each other in a different light.  Both parties need to ask each other questions like: “How did you feel when you entered our room?”  “What did you feel like when you saw us?”  “What were you thinking during the lockdown?” “Were you afraid?” “How do you feel now about what had happened?”

Fence mending is important.  Seeing each other as something other than our role is also important.

Multi-Tasking

My students swear they can do it.   Many managers ask if their employees can do it, but the fact of the matter is, It can’t be done.  Check out this article The Myth of Multi-Tasking by Christine Rosen. She finds an amalgamation of new research that shows that multi-tasking reduces performance, quality, and drops IQ (in an interesting study). I’m sold, however I would like to the authors of these studies why it seems that some people work better with background music on.

What is wrong with education?

Much ado about the state of education in the state of California.

Daily complaints:
Too crowed, not enough funding, charter schools, home schools, over-under legislated, lousy teachers, teacher unions, irrelevant curriculum, no vocational schools, teaching to the test, over testing, lack of parental participation…..the list goes on and on…and on.

Now that I am in the thick of it, I have some comments:
1) The method by which teachers are recruited and then educated is terrible. I have been disappointed with the administration and quality of what I am being taught and am asked to do to “prove” I am “worthy” of becoming a high school teacher. To be clear: we have some very nice, well-meaning, intelligent, and even competent instructors and administrators, but altogether, the system isn’t working well…if at all. I invite comment on this issue from some of my fellow teachers. My gripe list is 40 items long….feel free to send me a note and I add your complaint to mine and then submit it.

2) There is a lack of vocational programs in the schools. Somewhere along the way, decision makers got into their heads that everyone is college bound and therefore we only ought focus on sending students to college. Sure, college is the best way for people to improve their lot. It is however misguided and wrong to take away meaningful opportunities from young people and foist it on the community college system.

3) There is a lot of standardized testing. Why not roll the CaHSEE into STAR testing.
a: We would get better results from the STAR if students knew their graduation would depend on it.
b: We could eliminate days lost due to CaHSEE testing
c: We could eliminate duplicate bureaucracies and expenses saving the state millions a year.

I am very fortunate to teach where I do. I feel as if I make a difference everyday. I have great co-workers, administrators, and students. But I got lucky, others are struggling, and some have already left…